Saturday, May 31, 2008

Now is the time

A while ago, I turned off comments on my blog. I was sick of them, frankly. Sick of the reminder that people were out there reading my words. That seems naïve, I know. You publish a blog, you post regularly, and you get readers—that’s the way it works. But nevertheless, I started finding even the most innocuous comments an intrusion, as awful as that sounds. (I should be so lucky to have readers—how could I turn on them in this way?)

I realized yesterday—or maybe the realization finally crystallized—that my desire to turn off the comments was less about turning off the comments and more about stepping away from the blog and the world of blogs.

It is so easy, when your Google Reader is always full of excellent photographs, to feel as though the rest of the world is producing constantly, consistently, at a level you’re simply incapable of. It’s almost as if all the photographers whose blogs I read have become one photographer in my mind, and that one photographer never stops, never has to work, never gets sick or lacks inspiration. I know this isn’t true, of course—know that they all have their own struggles, that they all work hard to produce the work they do. But when all you see are the beautiful photographs, it’s hard to keep that in mind.

When S. and I were first together, I clung to him. Not literally, but so figuratively that it was almost literal. I was afraid that if I passed up one opportunity to spend time with him, one of two things would happen: (1) He would find someone else, or (2) he would die, and the last memory I would have would be of my saying no. The first fear came from years of insecurity, plus a cheating boyfriend or two for good measure. The second came from early losses in my life, as well as the very real fact that he’s simply an age at which people die without eliciting shocked gasps from those who read their obituaries. The why—on both counts—is less important than the what, and the what is less important than the effect it had on me, and on our relationship.

At some point in the past couple years, and honestly it’s been more of an evolution than the result of some turning point, I realized he loved me, and that I didn’t have to hold on so tight, that if he found someone else, well, that would be his loss, and if he died, well, that would be mine, but either way, I can’t control it. And it’s been so much better, in every way, since.

All of which is a way of saying that I’m feeling clingy with the blog. Feeling lucky to have drawn in some readers, and not wanting to lose them by not posting regularly. Feeling lucky to have gotten a tiny bit of attention for my work, and not wanting to lose that by not producing more. And not only that, but what if I don’t read all the other blogs out there? What if I miss out on something brilliant, something important, something crucial to my education as a photographer?

It’s time to let go. To stop focusing on the quantity of work that’s out there and focus on the work that matters to me. (Thanks, Ben, for that reminder.) To have faith that, if and when I start back up—whether that’s a week from now, a month from now, or longer—you’ll find me again. And if you don’t, I can’t control that. It’s time to focus on what I can control—my work—and nothing more.

I’m not sure when I’ll be back. Keep me in your Google Reader (or add me if I’m not already there), and chances are, my name will be bold all over again someday, and I’ll have something new to add to the conversation, some new light to shed, some new work to share. Until then, I’ll make like Alec and leave you with some words—Eastman, though, not Whitman:
Now it is day.
The sun is up.
Now is the time
for all dogs to get up.

“Get up!”
It is day.
Time to get going.
Go, dogs. Go!

—P. D. Eastman (from Go, Dog. Go!)

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, May 30, 2008

Delivering on a promise

It’s a lot harder to shoot a photograph that I’ll be sending to people for free, delivering on a promise, than I thought it would be. When they buy a photograph, you feel pretty good sending it out. But when they don’t have a clue what you’re sending them, you feel a pressure to send them something good, and how do know if what you think is good will be something they’ll like at all?

I’m thinking of sending out this one right now, but I also really like the one I posted Thursday, which is much better printed at 8½ by 11 inches than it is at 500 pixels wide on my blog. Maybe I’ll randomly send people one or the other. Or something else entirely. . . .

P.S. If you bought one of my prints, no fair telling me which one you like best (or that you don’t like either). Surprise is essential.


Copyright © 2008 Liz Kuball

Thursday, May 29, 2008

Bikini-clad ladder climber


Copyright © 2008 Liz Kuball

New site

I’ve got a brand-new Web site up! Check it out.

Of course, if you subscribe to my newsletter, you already know about the site. (Not a subscriber yet? Sign up here, or in the sidebar on my blog. I only send out newsletters four times a year, so don’t worry—I won’t spam you.)


Copyright © 2008 Liz Kuball

P.S. Thanks to Amani Olu at Made by Brown for all his hard work! If you want a site done well and done fast, Amani’s your man.

Labels: ,

I’m just sayin’ . . .

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

A very vulnerable thing

Thanks to a late-night e-mail from Susana Raab, I caught Jhumpa Lahiri on Charlie Rose last night, and that led me to reading some online interviews with her this afternoon. In one, at The Atlantic, she said:
It’s easy for me to think, Why am I doing this? There are so many great writers and great books—what’s the point? I can get into that mindframe pretty easily, and the more I see that this or that book is coming out, the more easily I go into a very scared place. I know that about myself. I feel protective of my work. And the ability to stay focused is a very vulnerable thing.
Blew my mind. In another interview, she said that she doesn’t have Internet access on her computer and has only really been online looking over other people’s shoulders. (The interview was from 1999, so maybe things have changed for her in the time since then, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they hadn’t.)

I love blogging, love that someone I met through blogging contacted me through e-mail to tell me about an interview with a writer I’d posted about here. But sometimes I read about other photographers and all they’re accomplishing, and I just want to shut down, forget the rest of the world, and live only in my own.

I haven’t yet ruled that out.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Yusuf Ozkizil (a.k.a. Chutney Bannister): Surreal Line

I realized recently that FILE Magazine has a feed for its projects (and for its single shots, too, but the projects are what interest me most). I used to check out FILE periodically, but sometimes months would go by between my visits, and I didn’t want to miss any more of the work that FILE publishes. Boy, am I glad, because the project that showed up in my Google Reader today is one I love. It’s Surreal Line, a project by Yusuf Ozkizil (who goes by the pseudonym Chutney Bannister on Flickr):
The Surreal Line is a series of images taken from an ongoing project, documenting moments of chance on the London Underground where static billboards and posters coalesce with the world around them.

I’m interested in how these advertisements, specifically designed for delivering one message, can have that story completely hijacked—often by the mere framing of a window—creating an entirely new context. Commuters, who are somewhat static, withdrawn, and locked in their own private routines, are oblivious to these momentary collisions. I’m fascinated by these chance encounters, and needless to say I gave up reading on the tube after my first trip on the surreal line.
Here are some of my favorite examples from the project. Click here to see the whole slide show.


Copyright © Yusuf Ozkizil


Copyright © Yusuf Ozkizil


Copyright © Yusuf Ozkizil


Copyright © Yusuf Ozkizil


Copyright © Yusuf Ozkizil


Copyright © Yusuf Ozkizil

P.S. This is why not banning photography on public transit is so important.

P.P.S. This is how to use advertising photographs, change them up, make them your own, and call them, justifiably, art. Can you tell how I feel about Richard Prince’s appropriation work?

Labels: , , , ,

Sunday, May 25, 2008

Haunted

I should be editing again tonight, making up from several days last week spent under a blanket, socked with a cold, drinking Sprite, and eating Breyer’s mint chocolate chip ice cream while watching TV. But today was cold and dreary, a typical May day along the coast in Southern California, and all I want to do is read more of Jhumpa Lahiri. I still haven’t found a passage that describes what my neighborhood project is about, but if it’s possible to learn about photography by reading fiction, I’m doing it. Not so much with the title story in Unaccustomed Earth (which I could take or leave), but with the second and third stories, “Hell–Heaven” and “A Choice of Accommodations,” both of which I read today. I haven’t yet figured out how to evoke the kind of feelings in my photographs that she does in her writing, but just reading Lahiri makes me feel it’s possible. Her stories haunt me.

Labels: , ,

Saturday, May 24, 2008

Susana Raab: Rank Strangers


Copyright © Susana Raab

I just got Susana Raab’s Rank Strangers, a zine she published recently, and can I just say, this is fifteen dollars very well spent. The zine looks fantastic, and it just makes me want to see her work in book form someday very, very soon. In the meantime, Rank Strangers is on my bookshelf next to all my favorite photo books, right where it belongs.

What are you waiting for? Go get yourself a copy before she runs out!

Labels: , , ,

A third option

Kate Hutchinson had a post last week that’s been on my mind. In it, she says:
Basically I think that there are two ways that newby photographers seem to progress, at least for those of us that start out with no money that is, no trust fund kids included in this list please. So either you start out shooting whatever kind of photography work that you can get paid for and do your own stuff on the side, or you work a steady job manning phones or something and then do your photo stuff on the side. I took the former route and it suited me well. It allowed me to use my photo skills and taught me a lot of business skills too. But it seems as though my type can get a bad rap. Those that worked a full time job till they hit the big work that they were aiming for seem untouchable because they never slummed around doing stuff like weddings. Well while we were getting paid to shoot they were manning phones.
I totally get the point Kate’s making, and I admire and respect the work she’s done—wedding and otherwise. But in reading her rant, as she called it (Kate, if you want a rant, I think I can give you a run for your money in that department), I couldn’t see myself in either camp. I’m not doing whatever kind of photography work that I can get paid for, and I’m not working a steady job manning phones (or waiting tables or tending bar or whatever). I’m working a career-type job, the kind that some people really want, that pays pretty well, and that requires a lot more of me than a pleasant phone voice.

I’ve often referred to my day job on this blog with a sense of disdain. But the fact of the matter is, I’ve got it pretty good, and I realized that tonight. It’s a Saturday night, and I’ve spent the past five hours or so editing a thirteen-page chapter that was probably the worst chapter I’ve read from an author in eleven years of editing. Seriously, it was that bad. It should not take five hours to edit thirteen pages. I should be able to edit thirteen pages in an hour, two hours if it’s really rough. So that gives you a sense of how bad it was. I didn’t have to work on this chapter tonight. I needed to get it done by Tuesday, but I had all weekend to finish it. And the reason I stuck with it was because it felt good. I was turning this piece-of-shit chapter into something really solid, something useful to readers, something that would make this author look a thousand times better than she really is. I was showing her—through my queries and notes, through flat-out rewriting her text—how to be better with the next chapter. I was giving her the chance to learn and improve. And I was doing it with no sense of frustration or impatience (a rarity for me, I admit). Hell, I was even encouraging, looking for the few things she did right and making sure to point those out.

I have no idea whether this author is the sort who’ll respond well to this incredibly heavy edit and eight single-spaced pages of queries, or whether she’ll be defensive and overwhelmed. But for now, in these moments just after finishing the chapter, I can assume she’ll be the former, that she’ll appreciate the work I’ve done, that she’ll study my edits and use them going forward, that this book will be one of the best books on the market because of it. For now, my work matters. And that’s no small thing.

So, add to your list, Kate, a third option: doing a job completely unrelated to photography, but one that challenges you, one you take satisfaction in, and one you occasionally kick ass at. It beats answering phones.

Labels: , ,

Thursday, May 22, 2008

Arrival

The lens arrived, safe and sound, and I can’t wait to get out there and use it. Prints will start making their way to people in the next few weeks. Many, many thanks again to all the people who bought, and to all the rest as well.

Out for delivery

Departed Ontario

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Arrived Ontario

Departed Philadelphia

Bobby and Teddy

There has been some posting in the blogosphere today about the RFK photos by Harry Benson and the RFK funeral train photos by Paul Fusco.

I have spent the latter part of the morning in front of CNN, watching with increasing sadness the news of Ted Kennedy’s brain cancer. It doesn’t look good.

If you’re like me, and you turn to history for answers and for hope, you may want to revisit Senator Kennedy’s inspiring eulogy to his brother Robert. The following video contains a brief clip from the end. To listen to the eulogy in its entirety, click here.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Departed Secaucus

Monday, May 19, 2008

Contributors

Internal Revenue Service (economic stimulus refund): $600
Mom and Dad (birthday): $300
Aunt Nancy and Uncle Chuck (birthday): $25
Aline (print sale): $20
Colin (print sale): $20
Mel (print sale): $20
Susana (print sale): $20
Chase (print sale): $20
Alan (print sale): $20
Catherine (print sale): $20
Brian (print sale): $20
Alex (print sale): $20
Daniel (print sale): $20
Dalton (print sale): $20
Ed (print sale): $20
William (print sale): $20
Patricia (print sale): $20
Kate (print sale): $20
Amani (print sale): $20
Richard (print sale): $20
Jon (print sale): $20
Lisa (print sale): $20
Michael (print sale): $20
Des (print sale): $20
Tim (print sale): $20
Eric (print sale): $20
Brad (print sale): $20
Say (print sale): $20
Total: $1,425

Receipt from Adorama * : $1,392

Thanks, everyone! Your free images, taken with this new lens, will be on their way to you just as soon as UPS comes a-knockin’. I can’t wait!

P.S. Doesn’t the Internet blow your mind?

P.P.S. Do you think I should send a free print to the IRS? (Kidding. Sort of.)

* B&H was sold out.

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Stephen K. Schuster: Kelly


Copyright © Stephen K. Schuster

Last week, photographer Steven K. Schuster, a curator for Humble Arts Foundation and director of photography at Mass Appeal magazine, e-mailed me and let me know about his new self-published book and asked if he could send me a copy. Like Amy Stein, I love getting gifts in the mail, so I wasn’t about to turn him down. Plus, I liked his simple description of the book: “a limited-edition photography book on a past relationship. It’s called Kelly. . . .” Given my past few days of thinking about a photo project on my relationship with S., it seemed serendipitous.

I don’t think it’s easy, photographing a relationship. I could see some photographers using the camera as a barrier between themselves and their partners. There’s that whole idea that if you’re photographing something, you’re not really experiencing it—you’re thinking about the camera instead of engaging in what’s happening around you, or you’re objectifying the person on the other side of the lens (like, some would say, Harry Callahan did with his wife, Eleanor—as Jon Feinstein alludes to in his introduction to Stephen’s book). And yet, to really photograph a relationship that you’re part of, I think you have to be all in—you can’t hold back any part of yourself. It seems like it could be a delicate balancing act. And if it is, Stephen has managed it without a misstep.

These images give me a real sense of who Stephen is (or who he was with Kelly), as well as a sense of who they were together. I keep looking through this book trying to figure out how or why I feel this way . . . and I don’t know if I have an answer yet. I just know that this little book is one I’ll return to again and again, and that’s no small thing.

For what it’s worth, I think that I experience things more deeply when I’m photographing—there’s a level of focus that I don’t have otherwise. And that makes me want to photograph my relationship with S. even more.

Thanks, Stephen, for sending this my way.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Thanks

A humongous thank-you to Aline, Colin, Mel, Susana, Chase, Alan, Catherine, Brian, Alex, Daniel, Dalton, Ed, William, Patricia, Kate, Amani, Richard, Jon, Lisa, Michael, Des, Tim, Eric, Brad, and Say, each of whom bought a print from me today. I didn’t expect to sell out in nine hours, but what can I say? I’ve got some really cool blog readers and friends.

I’ll post again when I place my order. (I’m waiting until the money from Google Checkout actually shows up in my bank account. Chicken, eggs, hatched, and all that.) The prints will go out first thing in the morning.

Thanks again, everyone!

20x25: My first ever print sale

I crunched some numbers over the weekend, and I have good news and bad news: The good news is, I’m just shy of having enough money to buy a lens I need. The bad news is, I have to pay down my credit cards before I can buy anything that big.

So I’ve decided to print one of my photos (see below) in an edition of twenty-five and sell them for $20 each. Jen Bekman sells her $20 prints in editions of two hundred, so think of the bargain you’re getting here in such a small edition for such a low price. Plus, you’ll have the satisfaction of knowing you helped out a photographer. And you’ll get a cool print.

Here’s the really cool part, though: When the edition sells out—when all twenty-five of the prints are sold—I will buy the lens, and upon doing so, I will send each of the twenty-five buyers an additional free print of a photograph made with the new lens. So two prints for the price of one! All the more reason for you to tell your family, friends, neighbors, and anyone else you know to get in on the action. The sooner the edition sells out, the sooner you get your second free print!

This is all being done through Google Checkout. The cost of shipping is $2 within the United States. For all orders outside the United States, shipping is $5. The prints are archival pigment prints on 8½-x-11-inch paper, signed and numbered on the verso.

Thanks, guys!


Copyright © 2007 Liz Kuball



SOLD OUT

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Robert Frank and relationships

Any book—photo or otherwise—has my adoration when not only do I want to return to it again and again, but every time I do return to it, I find something new to love. That’s the way it works with everything in my life, actually—people, places, dogs. If I find everything there is to know and love on the first visit, it won’t last. Lucky for me, I find new things to love about S. all the time.

I’ve been looking at The Americans again, in anticipation of the new edition from Steidl. The images that are grabbing me today are these. I don’t think it’s any coincidence that these are all images about relationships. Amy Stein suggested the other day that I do a photo project on my relationship with S. I’ve thought about that possibility in the past, but I’ve always set it aside because I couldn’t figure out how to do it. Since Amy’s e-mail, though, it’s been on my mind, and possibilities are starting to come to me. I’m not sure any of them will stick, but the wondering is fun.


Charleston, South Carolina. Copyright © Robert Frank


Chattanooga, Tennessee. Copyright © Robert Frank


Indianapolis. Copyright © Robert Frank


U.S. 90, en route to Del Rio, Texas. Copyright © Robert Frank

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, May 12, 2008

Sneak peek

Okay, so anyone who reads my blog via a feed reader has probably gotten the hint that a print sale is in the works. I was doing some testing, making sure that my Google Checkout button was working, and my post went live before I was ready for it to. I’ve since deleted it, but it may still be in your feed reader.

I should have the details worked out in the next couple days, and as soon as I’m ready, I’ll go live with it. Stay tuned. And sorry for any confusion!

Friday, May 09, 2008

Crop

On my last post, David commented saying he liked the second image best, but cropped square. Here it is.


Copyright © 2008 Liz Kuball

Wednesday, May 07, 2008

Possibilities

Not sure if I like any of these, but maybe.


Copyright © 2008 Liz Kuball


Copyright © 2008 Liz Kuball


Copyright © 2008 Liz Kuball


Copyright © 2008 Liz Kuball

Patrick Romero: 28 famous views of los angeles

Too long ago for me to only be writing about it now, Patrick Romero sent me a copy of his self-published 28 famous views of los angeles. My delay in writing about the book should in no way be seen as a commentary on the work itself—it’s beautiful, the kind of book I aspire to producing myself someday. In twenty-eight photographs—a mix of portraits and landscapes and street photography—he finds a way to evoke the essence of Los Angeles, which is no easy task.

I had my copy sitting on my desk. S. and I were on our way out the door, and I thought he was right behind me. When I realized he wasn’t, I went back to my office and found him sitting in my chair, looking at the book. “This is good,” he said. Couldn’t have said it better myself.

Word is, Patrick may have a few copies left for sale. Snag one while they’re still available.

P.S. Thanks, Patrick, for sending a copy my way.

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, May 05, 2008

My interview debut

Can’t get enough of me? Check out this interview on You Call This Photography? A big thank-you to the guys at Farting on Thunder for asking the questions. I had a lot of fun answering them.

Labels: ,

Saturday, May 03, 2008

Neighborhood


Copyright © 2008 Liz Kuball


Copyright © 2008 Liz Kuball


Copyright © 2008 Liz Kuball


Copyright © 2008 Liz Kuball

Thursday, May 01, 2008

First steps

Last week I took my first steps toward editorial photography, by sending samples of my work to photo editors at five magazines that I would want to work for and, more important, where I could see my work fitting in. I know it’ll take follow-up and persistence to get into these places, but I specifically chose just five—as opposed to sending out a blast of hundreds of promo cards—because I want to build relationships with these editors and their publications, and that takes effort. I sent handwritten notes to each editor, with five or six 5-x-7-inch archival prints of my work—prints I know may have already ended up in the recycling bin, but ones that had some chance, I think, of at least being stuck up on a bulletin board. My next step is to follow up in a month with a few more images. And it’ll go on from there.

In my other life, as a freelance book editor, I’ve done well for myself—getting plenty of work from a core group of clients—by working to foster those relationships. Part of it, of course, is just that you want to work. But a bigger part of it, for me, is that I want to work for people I like and respect, and publications that I admire. As an editor, I’ve had the occasional one-off project—some publisher calls me up and asks if I can work on such-and-such book on a rush schedule and politely haggles with me over my rate—and while it’s nice to pick up a little extra cash here or there, those aren’t the publishers or projects I remember. The ones I care about are the ones that I’ve worked with for a decade, people who respect my work and whose books I actually like. That’s what I’m looking to do with my photography. It isn’t just about adding a magazine to my client list—it’s about the long haul.

I also sent my book to a rep I met a few months ago. She represents some photographers I really respect, and she’s given me some excellent advice—advice I put to use when I decided which magazines to contact and how to do it. I want this woman to be my rep someday. Why? Because (1) I like the diversity of photographers she represents, (2) she gets the interplay between fine art and editorial/commercial and she encourages that in her stable of photographers, and (3) I had a ton of fun talking with her when we met. Again, it’s all about building relationships, so I e-mailed her to ask if I could share my book with her, she said she’d like to see it, and it’ll be delivered to her today. Do I think anything significant will come out of this one experience? Nope. I think I’ll need to work at this for at least a couple years, continuing to show her my work, continuing to produce work and put it out there (in galleries, in contests, in magazines), continuing to seek and heed her advice. And then, maybe, if she has as much fun dealing with me as I have dealing with her, she’ll rep me.

In the meantime, back to my day job. Today’s assignment: Finish copyediting a travel book on Egypt. I keep hearing The Bangles in my mind.

Labels: , , ,