I’m back
In early January, I attended Review LA, a portfolio review sponsored by Center and held in conjunction with photo la in my old neighborhood, Santa Monica. This was my first official portfolio review, and I came away with concrete advice on places to send my work, images to cut from my portfolio, approaches to take going forward—it was everything I hoped it would be.
And yet, since then, I’ve been stuck in the doldrums. Just in the past few weeks, I’ve bemoaned my apparent inability to get anything done, thrown in the towel (at least temporarily on my In Store project), tried to get going on something else, all with lackluster results.
Today I realized that I haven’t been wasting time these past couple months. I’ve actually been processing everything I’ve learned—I just didn’t know it.
I went out this morning on my second shoot for a new project I’d been thinking about for a while (and on which I’d gotten some strong encouragement at Review LA from Kristine Wilson of Ogilvy & Mather). It’s the kind of project that looks good on paper but doesn’t hold as much promise in the execution. I may give it another try, but I identified some critical issues with it that just aren’t going away, so if you’re placing bets, I’d bet against my resuming it anytime soon.
The good news is that, while working on this new project, trying different approaches, thinking about why it wasn’t working for me, I defined more clearly for myself what my In Store project is about for me and why I am (present tense, not past) passionate about it. I’d gotten some feedback from people that they wanted to see more images of the items in storage, images with people in them. In fact, Portrait Month was all about my getting comfortable with making portraits, in an effort to prepare myself for incorporating portraits into In Store. I had so much fun in December, and I’m really pleased with some of the portraits I made. But I don’t think portraits belong in In Store, and here’s why: That project, for me, isn’t about the people who have stuff in storage. It’s about the places where we put our stuff. I say in my project statement, written before all this talk of portraits began, that for me it’s about “imagining what’s behind closed doors.” Imagining. Not literally finding out. For me, the magic of these places is more real when I focus on the buildings and structures themselves, telling myself stories about what’s there and why.
When this dawned on me this afternoon at coffee with S., I could feel the wind pick up and my sail caught that wind, and that was all I needed.
I went home and took a fresh look at the images in the project, and I could see that, of the forty-five images on my site right now, only about fifteen of them are ones I consider good. The rest are lacking in some way. But that’s okay—I’ll keep working on the project, swap out the images that aren’t working with new ones that do, until I have the project where I want it to be, until it’s done.
Another agenda item: Read more poetry. (Who doesn’t need more poetry in her life?) Step away from the television and PDN, and pick up a book, something that has nothing at all to do with photography. David McCullough’s 1776 has been on my shelf for a long time. So have Pablo Neruda and Coast of Dreams. Maybe I’ll start there.
I’m back.
And yet, since then, I’ve been stuck in the doldrums. Just in the past few weeks, I’ve bemoaned my apparent inability to get anything done, thrown in the towel (at least temporarily on my In Store project), tried to get going on something else, all with lackluster results.
Today I realized that I haven’t been wasting time these past couple months. I’ve actually been processing everything I’ve learned—I just didn’t know it.
I went out this morning on my second shoot for a new project I’d been thinking about for a while (and on which I’d gotten some strong encouragement at Review LA from Kristine Wilson of Ogilvy & Mather). It’s the kind of project that looks good on paper but doesn’t hold as much promise in the execution. I may give it another try, but I identified some critical issues with it that just aren’t going away, so if you’re placing bets, I’d bet against my resuming it anytime soon.
The good news is that, while working on this new project, trying different approaches, thinking about why it wasn’t working for me, I defined more clearly for myself what my In Store project is about for me and why I am (present tense, not past) passionate about it. I’d gotten some feedback from people that they wanted to see more images of the items in storage, images with people in them. In fact, Portrait Month was all about my getting comfortable with making portraits, in an effort to prepare myself for incorporating portraits into In Store. I had so much fun in December, and I’m really pleased with some of the portraits I made. But I don’t think portraits belong in In Store, and here’s why: That project, for me, isn’t about the people who have stuff in storage. It’s about the places where we put our stuff. I say in my project statement, written before all this talk of portraits began, that for me it’s about “imagining what’s behind closed doors.” Imagining. Not literally finding out. For me, the magic of these places is more real when I focus on the buildings and structures themselves, telling myself stories about what’s there and why.
When this dawned on me this afternoon at coffee with S., I could feel the wind pick up and my sail caught that wind, and that was all I needed.
I went home and took a fresh look at the images in the project, and I could see that, of the forty-five images on my site right now, only about fifteen of them are ones I consider good. The rest are lacking in some way. But that’s okay—I’ll keep working on the project, swap out the images that aren’t working with new ones that do, until I have the project where I want it to be, until it’s done.
Another agenda item: Read more poetry. (Who doesn’t need more poetry in her life?) Step away from the television and PDN, and pick up a book, something that has nothing at all to do with photography. David McCullough’s 1776 has been on my shelf for a long time. So have Pablo Neruda and Coast of Dreams. Maybe I’ll start there.
I’m back.
Labels: books, Kristine Wilson, Pablo Neruda, photo la, poetry, portfolio reviews, portraits, Review LA, S.



6 Comments:
Hi Liz,
Just had to write about your last two posts. I can totally relate to what has been said. My first portfolio review was also Review LA. I went in to the review with of goal of just getting feedback on a new project I started several months before. I chose this review because it was 1) non-juried, 2) fairly nearby (I'm in San Francisco), 3) reasonably priced, and to a lesser degree, new on the scene. I never expected to get an offer for a show, or representation or publication. Just advice.
What I came away with was a much clearer idea of what the project was. Anthony Bannon from George Eastman House nailed it best for me when he told me to learn about semiotics (study of signs and symbols). Applying those principles radically changed how I characterized my project. The images stayed the same, but my statement changed. It took several weeks to crystalize in my mind, but by March I was ready to try again. Not all the advice was good. Some reviewers wanted to separate my work into as many a three different bodies of work, others wanted to expand it. Just have to take what makes sense to you and move on.
Up next was a review in San Francisco put on by PhotoAlliance called "Our World". It was a juried review and I felt lucky to get in. Here, I got greater number of reviews for a much cheaper price and in a much nicer environment. Because of what I learned at Review LA, I did really well at Our World. I got offers for a show and two publications. Again, I wasn't expecting anything - just wanted to see how my message was coming across.
My moral is this: 1) Stay away from the big reviews (FotoFest, Review Santa Fe, etc) unless you have a mature body of work that is ready NOW for publication. 2) Only go when you have a clear idea of what you want to come away with. There is a tendency to get addicted to the attention our work gets at these things. I met photographers in San Francisco who had also been to Review LA and were going on to FotoFest. Who can afford so much? I'm not doing anymore reviews this year - not till the project is done and I'm ready to really push it.
Sounds to me you have the right approach to doing reviews. Go, learn, react.
Thanks for the comment, DG.
Yeah, I mean, I understand what an emotional roller coaster those things can be, but I try to separate myself from my photographs before I go in, so that I don't take everything anyone says, good or bad, personally. It's all about meeting people, weighing their advice, and making your own decisions about what's right for your project.
For what it's worth, there was an interesting post about FotoFest on Shoot! The Blog recently that presented another point of view on whether to wait to go to those big events until you have a completed project. You may find it interesting.
Ultimately, there's no one right path, no one right way. Some people get a lot out of the big events right from the start; others never do. A lot of it is trial and error.
Congratulations on your success at Our World! Best wishes.
I really needed to read this, thanks for posting this! Lately I've been in the doldrums too regarding my own work. I've never been to a portfolio review, however I'm in grad school so critiques are constant. I don't think I've entirely settled on how to approach a new project I've been thinking about and I'm not sure how I'm going to continue the one I've been working on but it's good to know that I'm not the only one who struggles with this kind of thing.
No problem, Danielle. I'm glad it helped!
Hey liz,
I'm with Danielle. I appreciate the honesty you shared of struggling to find your way with your work, career and photography in general. I have those same feelings often and many times feel as if I am not doing enough. All to often the blogosphere can become overwhelming because every blogger can seem like they are making it happen 24/7 and their big one just came in etc. So i appreciate the honesty concerning your experiences including the highs and the lows.
Grant, yeah, when I started this blog, I was totally unaware of the photoblogosphere, but my idea was partly to get myself to put my work out there, and partly to share the ups and downs, highs and lows, because that's the kind of stuff I like to read. (I figure if I write the kind of things I like to read, and if I shoot the kinds of photos I like to look at, I'll please myself, and that's the best place to start.)
It's really easy for a blog to be used as a marketing tool, sharing only one's latest shows or sales and/or plugging one's friends' latest shows or sales. And there's absolutely nothing wrong with that. Some of my favorite photographers do that with their blogs, and I'm a loyal reader. But I'm more interested in the whole story.
I've found that many of these same photographers are more than willing to share their ups and downs by e-mail or in conversation. And I don't think it's just that they're trying to present for public consumption a perfect image of themselves and their careers. The fact is, many people, understandably, struggle to open up in writing. For whatever reason, when I sit down to write this blog, I guess I'm in the same mindset that I'm in when I'm e-mailing or writing a letter to a friend. It's not conscious, but that's the general mood I'm in. And so talking about the crap is just as easy as talking about the good stuff.
It's gratifying to know that other people are actually getting something out of this, especially since I'm doing it primarily for myself. :)
Thanks for the comment and encouragement, and best of luck with your own work!
Post a Comment
<< Home